I recently saw an article (reposted by one of my
Facebook friends) written by a man who grew up in a certain church but left it in
favor of a different denomination. When he went to a service at his old church
with his parents many years later, he was “triggered” by what he saw there. He
then proceeded to bash his old church and the entire denomination in his blog.
I have Facebook friends from all walks of life, of
many different political and religious views, and I am sad to say that I see
this kind of thing all too often, coming equally from all sides. It’s one thing
if such condemnation comes from a non-Christian, but when the conflict and
attacks are between fellow Christians or “rival” denominations, it’s truly a
tragedy. Whether in church, on a blog, or on Facebook, the problem is the same:
human nature. We see all sides pointing fingers, saying things like, "Well
you can't be a Christian if..." (insert your topic of moral outrage).
On one hand, we have legalism, which can manifest as (real or perceived) bigotry or discrimination of one form or another. People falling into this trap are often stereotypically “judgmental” of others, whether their approach is abrasive or overly sweet. On the other side, we have an overabundance of "liberty,” which can manifest as (real or perceived) departure from God's Law, leading one into (real or perceived) open sinfulness. Those who fall into this category may do well by demonstrating love and acceptance to others, but they often fail to recognize the importance of Jesus’ own command to “go and sin no more.”
Both sides err equally.
Now from my own (admittedly imperfect) point of view,
some of the ideas with which I disagree are easily “debunked.” I can make a sound, rational, scripturally
supported argument, and seemingly prove my point. But (there is always a but…), I’ve debated people from “the other side,” some of whom make
equally strong scriptural arguments of their own. So which of us is REALLY right? Which of us
is REALLY a Christian?
As it turns out, we can both be “real” Christians and yet have some serious differences. Romans 14
drives home the point that we are not
going to agree about everything, and that it is, in fact, OK to disagree on
some points. The only qualifiers are 1) true devotion to God and 2) that in our
disagreements, we are not to be judgmental of other believers. Only God knows
the heart, and only God is qualified to judge the quality or truth of our
professions of faith. God alone decides who will stand or fall.
“Who are
you to judge another’s servant? To his own master he stands or falls. Indeed,
he will be made to stand, for God is able to make him stand.” Romans
14:4 (NKJV)
We cannot and must not draw any arbitrary lines in the
sand regarding another person’s salvation or standing as a Christian based on
the presence or absence of certain behaviors. This is not to say that we should
never correct another Christian when we believe them to be in error. Certainly we
should lovingly correct sinful behavior, but even that should be done as privately
as possible, as outlined in Matthew
18:15-17. Such discipline might have to come before the church, but should
not be advertised to the public at large.
On both sides of any issue, we have to remain focused on
Christ. Excessive preoccupation with ourselves and “what we think,” especially when it comes to public conflicts with
other believers, is a huge factor in the public’s declining view of the church
today. How can we be a light to the world if we are spewing darkness? We simply
cannot belittle and insult other followers of Christ, no matter how wrong we
believe them to be.
There is truly a vast distance between the two ends of
the spectrum: a wide road leading to destruction. The straight, narrow, and
true path MUST be somewhere in the middle, but only one man in all of human
history has been able to find that road and walk perfectly upon it.
We nailed Him
to a cross.
Jesus forgives even the vilest of our sins. How, then,
should we treat other Christians who seem (to us at least) to be doing
everything wrong?
Reading this passage from John 8 seems to be a good
place to start:
Now early
in the morning He came again into the temple, and all the people came to Him;
and He sat down and taught them. Then the scribes and Pharisees brought to Him
a woman caught in adultery. And when they had set her in the midst, they said
to Him, “Teacher, this woman was caught in adultery, in the very act. Now
Moses, in the law, commanded us that such should be stoned. But what do You
say?” This they said, testing Him, that
they might have something of which to accuse Him. But Jesus stooped down and
wrote on the ground with His finger, as though He did not hear.
So when
they continued asking Him, He raised Himself up and said to them, “He who is
without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first.” And again He
stooped down and wrote on the ground. Then those who heard it, being convicted
by their conscience, went out one by one, beginning with the oldest even to the
last. And Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst. When Jesus
had raised Himself up and saw no one but the woman, He said to her, “Woman,
where are those accusers of yours? Has no one condemned you?”
She said,
“No one, Lord.”
And Jesus
said to her, “Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.”
Then Jesus
spoke to them again, saying, “I am the light of the world. He who follows Me
shall not walk in darkness, but have the light of life.”
~ John
8:2-12 (NKJV)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.