I am firmly convinced that most conflicts which arise
in a church can best be settled by the authority of the Bible. The problem is,
sometimes the Bible doesn’t tell us how to handle specific situations. For
example: at what temperature should the thermostat be set? At what time should
services begin? How long should services last? What color should the carpet be?
What kind of music should we sing? Should we have a Wednesday night service, or
just Sundays? And most importantly, for Baptists, when do we eat?
Well, the answer to that last one is actually another
question: when DON’T we Baptists eat?? But I digress.
The point is, sometimes the Bible gives very specific
instructions that really only apply (literally at least) to certain people at a
certain time. Joshua’s instructions to topple the walls of Jericho by marching
around the city while blowing trumpets and shouting would be such an instance.
But other passages in the Bible establish general principles that should be
kept in mind during a great many different possible scenarios, with Romans
chapter 14 being a prime example.
While the subjects literally mentioned in this passage
are 1) whether one should eat meat or only vegetables, and 2) which holidays
and festivals should one observe, the principles established in Romans 14 can
be applied to many different areas of conflict in a church. Of particular
importance are decisions which are really just a matter of personal opinions,
styles, or preferences – such as the color of the carpet.
Churches have indeed been split because folks couldn’t
agree on the carpet. Or… have they?
Romans 14 indicates that it is not so much the
particular issue at hand which is the problem, but rather whether or not our
response to the conflict reflects “walking in love.” In all honesty, no church
has ever split “really” because of the color of the carpet. The real reasons
for such conflicts leading to church splits is that when disagreements come,
some church members may feel as though their voices are not being heard – that they
have been left out, ignored, or ostracized. And it’s not about whether or not
we intended to hurt those individuals
(that should never be the motive of
any Christian), but rather how we react when the problem has been revealed.
Do we show love? Do we show a willingness to reach a
compromise? Do we honestly consider the “other” point of view? Do we try to
find a solution that will accommodate everyone?
I’m going to quote some verses from Romans 14, with
one slight edit. I am going to remove all the references to eating and drinking
or holiday observances and replace them with *X*. Wherever *X* appears, you
should feel free to substitute your area of conflict.
From Romans, Chapter 14…
13 Therefore let us not judge one
another anymore, but rather resolve this, not to put a stumbling block (or a
cause to fall) in our brother’s
way.
14 I know and am convinced by the Lord
Jesus that there is nothing
unclean of itself; but to him who considers anything to be unclean, to
him it is unclean.
15 Yet if your brother is grieved
because of *X*, you are no
longer walking in love. Do not destroy with *X* the one for whom Christ
died.
16 Therefore do not let your good be
spoken of as evil;
17 for the kingdom of God is not *X*,
but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.
18 For he who serves Christ in these
things is acceptable
to God and approved by men.
19 Therefore let us pursue the things which make for peace and the
things by which one may edify another.
20 Do not destroy the work of God for
the sake of *X*. All things indeed are pure,
but it is evil for
the man who [is offended by] *X*.
21 It is good
neither to *X* nor *X* nor do
anything by which your brother stumbles or is offended or is made
weak.
22 Do you have faith? Have it to yourself before God.
Happy is he who does
not condemn himself in what he approves.
23 But he who doubts is condemned if
he *X*, because he does not *X* from faith; for whatever is not from faith is sin.
One final note: while it is vital for those who have
done something which others might find offensive to examine themselves and
their actions under the microscope of love, the same is true of those who feel
offended. Conflict resolution is always
a two-way street. It is always uncomfortable.
It is always difficult. It always takes hard work and a willingness
to ride out the rough spots until the road becomes smooth once again.
In disputes which are not clear-cut matters of sin
under God’s law (the Old Testament law), there is often NO right or wrong –
merely differences of opinion. Does it really matter what color the carpet is?
The only path open to resolve conflicts of this nature includes a willingness
to give the other side the benefit of the doubt, and to assume that they just
might have a good point.
And indeed, all
sides must be willing to do so.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.